iteach and ilearn : 7 good rules for educational technology

are you an educator on twitter ? if therefore, you ought to be following @getting_smart, as a result of they're constantly sharing nice concepts for education. you ought to additionally follow tom vander ark ( @tvanderark--one of one's founders of receiving good ), as a result of he's full of valuable, challenging concepts and offers the analysis out to back it up.

i mention it for credit where credit is due, as a result of listed here brilliance isn't mine, however toms.

because we are part of a post from last summer, tom shared listed here nice concepts for deciding whether or not an educational technology is valued at adopting. ( the original piece is certainly worth reading too ! ) heres the 7 good rules for educational technology :

educational problem initial. begin with the matter, not the technology.
added worth. build certain that the technology can add worth out to alternative existing solutions.
sustainability. can the project be relevant and accessible along with the passage of time, or can external factors or lack of relevance eventually lead those concerned out to abandon it ?
multiple uses. choose a technology and style an intervention to make sure that the technology will be applied for multiple purposes/classes.
lowest cost. if a lower-cost technology is offered out to solve a selected problem, while it may well be less “politically attractive, ” ought to be'>it has to be used.
reliability. confirm that the technology is reliable and shall not rapidly break down.
simple use. excessively difficult technologies present barriers out to implementation and also the final success of one's intervention.
good thinking, right ?

a couple of of my reflections on these :
the very first one here will be the no-brainer out to me, however i believe its typically the foremost overlooked. i apprehend i tend for getting very keen about tech tools ( oooo... shiny ! ) while not absolutely thinking through the difficulties the tech may truly address. variety 5 goes right with primary ; abundant as i like my ipad... probably we ought to take into account lower cost tablets ? ( this apple-fanboy is cringing out to even say therefore... )
item variety seven comes right behind : if it isnt straightforward, nobody can utilize it however the über-geeky or über-stubborn. ( speaking as somebody who falls into each of those categories... ) item variety six corresponds : if youre continuously fighting with unreliable tools, how doubtless are you to actually use them ?
im all for variety four : multiple uses is vital ! alton brown enjoyed a nice bit on sensible eats where he decried uni-taskers within the kitchen. edtech really should be thought of in an identical fashion--no uni-taskers allowed.
variety 3 has me thinking. sustainability is a difficulty. im wondering regarding conditions like smartboards--have that they'd their day within the sun ? are these approaching irrelevance ? im not entirely certain... however im thinking regarding this.
im thinking plenty relating to the implications of one's second item within this list. i agree in principle--of course there really should be a value-add for any tech tool incorporated towards a classroom. what im wondering regarding is that if motivation is enough of the value-add out to count during this regard. im inclined to know therefore... however thats simply my best thinking right away.
to make sure that sums up my thoughts at the instant. what have you assume with this list ? and just how have you respond onto the concepts presented here ?